Intellectual Property (IP) is a valuable asset that is included
in a company's "balance sheet" and provides additional valuation
to a company. For early stage and small companies, IP may be the
company's sole or primary asset base.
Intellectual Property includes patents, trademarks, service
marks, copyrights, and trade secrets. This value-added asset can
be sold, bought and traded as a part of everyday commerce.
It is important for a company to know what IP it has and how to
enhance the company's IP position which, in turn, enhances the
company's valuation.
Patents are often the most valuable IP asset for most companies.
Strictly speaking there are three types of U.S. patents:
(1) Design Patents (for example, an ornamental design for an
article of manufacture) (2) Plant Patents (for example, an
asexually produced flower or plant) (3) Utility Patents
The most common patent for technology-based companies are
utility patents. Utility patents are granted to inventors
according to the Patent Act, which can be found at Title 35 of
the United States Code (U.S.C.) and states as follows:
"Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process,
machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and
useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefore,
subject to the conditions and requirements of this title." (35
U.S.C., §101)
Equally as important as what is patentable is what is not
patentable. What are not patentable are:
(1) Laws of nature (2) Physical phenomena (3) Abstract ideas
(4) Products of nature
However, what constitutes patentable subject matter has come
under broad interpretation as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court
decision in Diamond vs. Chakraborty (1980), which established
that companies or individuals could receive utility patents for
newly created organisms. Since then, the biotechnology industry
has argued that patents should issue on genes, proteins and
other natural materials which have commercial value.
Primarily as an effort to boost U.S. eminence and
competitiveness to the then fledgling but growing biotech
industry, shortly after the Diamond vs. Chakraborty decision the
U.S. Patent Office (USPTO) began issuing patents on products of
nature including genes (human or otherwise), gene fragments,
cell lines, proteins and other naturally occurring substances.
As a result of increasingly growing criticism, the USPTO has
recently issued utility patent guidelines and rules regarding a
stricter definition of what is invented or patentable. These new
guidelines and rules call for utility patents to have "specific
and substantial utility that is credible."
No longer will it be sufficient to claim that a particular
biological or molecular probe (DNA, protein, etc.) to be a
useful probe, the new utility test calls for specific utility
regarding that particular molecular probe (i.e., a probe for a
particular gene, a probe for a specific disease state or a probe
for a defined location on a chromosome).
In addition, it is no longer acceptable to make general claims
regarding utility and usefulness. For example, it will not be
acceptable to claim that a protein is a source of amino acids or
a feed supplement or a dietary supplement, but real-world
utility must be specified and demonstrated.
The new utility patent guidelines and rules will have a profound
effect on the biotech and related industries.
Visit www.BusinessOfScience.com for additional
information concerning Intellectual Property (IP) and the
business of science and technology.
About the author:
Louis M. Scarmoutzos, Ph.D., or "Dr. Lou" as his colleagues and
friends fondly call him, is President and Founder of MVS
Solutions, Inc.- a corporate and technology development company
focused on the biotech, chemistry, pharmaceutical, medical
technology and related industries. Visit www.mvssolutions.com for additional info
concerning Dr. Scarmoutzos and MVS Solutions.